Would a safety-critical project normally possess automatic test software which is validated by a manufacturer ?

Generic stooge "counterspy" persists particularly well in a talentless vacuum because legitimate inquiry occurs, most generally, elsewhere. Turgid mantra is thus fundamental to reinforcement of the dubious project: instead of writing ad copy for an external product that can be regulated by society, counterspy employs the specific technique to relentlessly reinforce, but not specifically exposit, and so accidentally corrupt, the general view (Gk. doxei) that the particular communicative medium is legitimate (not questionable). While I do not question the legitimacy of the generally accepted view, per se, I do indeed question, as an individual with no self-interest, the pernicious techniques employed by the conscript YA stooges to manipulate the target audience, i.e., regulate the general view as a means of avoiding regulation.